2716 Wiggle Worm.

Patreon
Subscribestar
Comic Vote
Reddit
Wiki
Presents List
Shirts & such.
Ko-Fi.

Since the store is doing better I feel like that would have taken some of the pressure off of Carol that she never really expressed early on in the comic. At least that’s why I’m writing her as loosening up and allowing herself to be playful in the actual store to a degree she never really allowed herself to be before. She feels safe now in a way she didn’t before since she has a good working relationship with Mike and isn’t hiding her feelings from Thomas anymore. Also, I think Mike has a crush on all of the girls in the store to one degree or another and restrains himself from doing anything about that because he understands the power imbalance and strife that sort of thing would cause. I think there must be alternate universes where Mike could form a relationship with any of the girls in the store because he’s a very good man. The fact that he doesn’t act on his impulses speaks to that. He’s shown on more than one occasion that he will bend the rules for the girls because of their physical beauty though. I mean, nobody’s perfect.
If Mike was the protagonist I think he would have the strongest feelings for Carol. Much like Thomas I think he’s attracted to her because she has qualities that are weak in his character. Obviously she’s pretty, but the deeper connection would be those things, very similarly to Thomas. Mike and Thomas have similar personalities in that they share certain weaknesses that Carol could compensate for in a relationship. Mike isn’t a tactician the way Thomas is though. He’s just a good natured regular guy who does his best. I think those kinds of guys should win too though.
I think a pairing between Mike and Nina would work, but not the same way that it would with Thomas and Nina. Mike and Nina don’t have whatever spark of chemistry that Thomas and Nina have. Many people have told me that Nina is the girl Thomas should be with and that’s how the comic should ultimately end. I have to say their arguments have merit. They would have a very different kind of life but it wouldn’t be bad. Much like Nina said, if Carol hadn’t come along they probably would eventually let their friendship become a romance. It would be neat to write that story, but I don’t think I’ll ever have the time. As far as Mike goes he and Nina do have common interests and a place to start from, but I don’t think the spark would ever catch fire for her. You never know though, Mike has a bit of a heroic streak in him and Nina does like a main character.
I think of all the pairings in the actual universe Mike and Brooksie is the one that has the most actual chance of happening. If they spent a lot of time together she would be very drawn to his calming, strong, presence. He also enjoys popular culture, gaming, and the other things Jo thinks are fun. He would help her make movies in many ways since he has a background in practical things. Plus a big, encompassing, hug when she feels anxious would be very enticing to Jo.
Amusingly Jess and Mike would be a good pairing too because Mike would instantly be down for any and all of her schemes. You can see in the RPG arc that he finds her character extremely amusing and that would carry over into real life. He would be her henchman with benefits. Of course that kind of leaves the door open for him to be the third wheel in Jess and Jo’s Bi-cycle… I’m not sure I could convincingly write that outcome into the comic in a way that didn’t end in disaster though.
If nothing else all of this stuff is fun to think abut and gives me a foundation for writing the motivations of the characters convincingly.
The storm tonight threw off my creation process so this page went up much later than normal. For that I apologize. I tried to use the extra time provided to at least make it more dynamic. I hope that at least is appreciated.

I hope you have a safe weekend and return to me on Monday for more comic. Until then, remember to exist in the context.

17 Comments

I really enjoyed reading your writeup this time, the deeper look inside of the characters and the whimsical what if quality of how they would fit together. I feel like one of the reasons I’m so drawn to between failures is because of that depth of thought behind the characters. They have so much more depth than I’m used to. As well as how much of your own process and emotions you share through the blog under the comic. Thank you for sharing, writing, and being vulnerable with us.

I was actually thinking about this the other day. When I started the comic the idea that you were part of the draw, or a selling point, was a very popular concept. Many comic creators would share everything about themselves until the internet started getting super mean and vindictive about it. I never really stopped excepting for things where I’ve been scolded by my family. I’m not sure how many people still operate like this but the ones I used to read mostly don’t. I’m glad you enjoy my rambling though.

Frankly, I come as much to read your thoughts as I do for the comic. I’m sure at least part of it is due to me seeing a lot of my personality in your tangeants and writing style, but a lot of it is also that you just make reading your thoughts interesting. This combination of good storytelling and relatability keeps me coming back more than any amount of technical skill ever would.

“If Mike was the protagonist I think he would have the strongest feelings for Carol.”

On that list of ‘strong feelings for Carol’ add Thomas, Brooksie, Nina…

I would die of joy if Brooksie and Mike were a couple. The waves of adorable awkwardness between them would be powerful enough to destroy planets!

Don’t get me wrong, I love Jolene and Jess’s dynamic and I’m glad it’s going so well. But I wanna see Mikesie, dammit!

With that said, I think Rulette may take a shine to our favorite quirky manager one day…

I normally don’t do shipping, but Mike-Rulette is one ship I can get behind. Not only would Mike be free to pursue that one, not being Rulette’s boss, but they would really supplement each other very well. Rulette has the outgoing personality and the daring that Mike is too reserved and too cautious to have, and the calming solidity of Mike would be good for the insecurities one can feel just under the surface of Rulette’s brashness.
Incidentially, it’s probably another sign of what Ocean says about the depth of Jackie’s characters that it can make me break my usual ‘no shipping’-rule

…you know what, I absolutely love the thought of Mike ending up the meat in a girl sandwich, so to speak. It’s probably exactly the kind of thing he figured would NEVER happen to him. And yet, there it is. Terrifying in its splendor.

So Thomas has a shit to give? Maybe typo? Couldn’t give a shit?

The phrases could/couldn’t give a shit are basically interchangeable in American English. In this context he means “I could give a shit, but I don’t” with “but I don’t” being the subtext. Most people with a basic ability to parse intent would pick up on that and understand his meaning from context. I’m not sure if regionality has any impact on usage, but it’s more common in this area to say “could give a shit” than couldn’t. Which I think comes down to the cadence of our accent. Couldn’t causes the flow of words to catch on the contraction while could allows us to move into the rest of the sentence fluidly. That said, Thomas tends to speak in a clearer, more correct, northerly way when he’s trying to make a case for something and only switches to his Midwest dialect when he’s openly showing true emotion. His genuine dislike of Wes causes him to slip into casual mode for a moment.
All of that said a person could still interpret what he said as he does have a limited amount of shits to give concerning Wes and it still conveys the basic premise that in the case of Wes his patience is strained and for other people he has functionally limitless shits to give. So even though I decided to go with an accurate depiction of my regional dialect I feel safe in assuming that even someone of the meanest intelligence should be able to decipher the meaning of this interaction well enough to grasp the intent.

As someone with an advanced degree in English, and who has taught English as a Second Language for a living, that is a very good — and patient — description of what is going on. As Weird Al pointed out in his song “Word Crimes,” the current colloquial usage in American English is grammatically incoherent. However, that’s the main difference between colloquial and formal usage. Informal users could care less… ;)

That is *ahem* a very nice angle for Carol, and I encourage drawing her this way as much as possible in the future. >.>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.