Minus 10 points to Thomas for forgetting the law of Ninjas.Their effectiveness is inversely proportional to their quantity.
Unless they’re trained in the inversely goal oriented yet equally effective art of Brooksie Fu
Is that a Dr.McNinja reference I read? That was good.
Not exactly. It’s the Law of Conservation of Ninjutsu:“In any battle involving ninja, each side has a finite amount of ninjutsu that must be divided amongst that side’s ninja. Thus, a single ninja has all of his side’s ninjutsu, and is exponentially more powerful than his thousand ninja opponents.”
How did we agree we were gonna attack? All at once. And how did we really attack? One at a time.
Thus the most effective ninja is the one that doesn’t exist? The Law of Ninjas needs a corollary: excepting instances of pirate involvment, the ninja effectiveness threshold is a function of positive integers.
Denied, the most effective ninja isn’t a ninja at all she is a ninjo.
Oh really?Well, try to find half a ninja. I dare you.
True indeed, he is so stealthy you can’t even touch him and therefore he effectively doesn’t exist.
A Ninja that doesn’t exist could get away with ANYTHING
I can already bet that Brooksie is somewhere close by listening. Either that, or she’s going to appear any second now.
the ninjs that doesn’t exist is the ultimate ninja, because if you dont exist, noone can EVER see you or find you, or know your there. which are what ninja strive for
But if they don’t exist, they can’t kill.
I am having flashbacks to Questionable Content’s Music Hipster Quantum Mechanics Theory and to the Modesto ninja parade.
oh noes! Not TEN ninjas!
Actually, using Calculus, we can not only pin-point that which does not exist, but predict it’s movements.
Now that statement stands in complete opposition to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which states that some pairs of physical properties, such as position and momentum, cannot be measured simultaneously above a certain degree of accuracy. Therefore you can EITHER pin-point a given object’s location, OR predict it’s movement.
On the other hand, a non-existent object can be pinpointed in both location and movement–as long as the total time elapsed is over the energy threshold for time-energy variations. . . .
Of course whether or not ninja are exempt from the rules of quantum mechanics has long since been the subject of debate among various groups of boffins.
Well, their ninjas. If they can’t do something, then Chuck Norris can.
Only when Morgan Freeman says so.
I love pseudoscience almost as much as I love pseudopods.
Due to the Inverse Ninja Law, it’s 1 ninja that you really need to worry about.
Love this comic, not only is the comic itself amazing, the comments are too! it’s like getting three or more great comics/jokes for the price of one!hypothetical question: what would the inverse ninja law say by about a ninja who has the strength of ten ninjas?
Quite simple. The strength of 10 ninjas in 1 would make 1 ninja even more effective. Strength of 10 in 1. Less to hide, more behind any attack.
Nae. Due to the Law of conservation of Ninjutsu, the strength of 10 ninjas 10/10=1 is equal to the strength of one ninja 1/1=1 and therefore a ninja with the strength of ten ninjas is the same as a ninja with the stength of a ninja, who is just a plain ninja.
…Wait, have I just proven that all ninjas have the same strength? Because that collapses the Law!
No, the law applies to ninjas working in groups. Conservation of ninjutsu has nothing to do with the power of ninjas relative to other ninjas, it just means that their power decreases (relative to their individual power) in groups. A ninja with the power of 10 ninjas is similarly not affected, since she isn’t working in a group with herself. However, she would be weaker if there were two of her.
Your email address will not be published.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.