1964 Resignation.

I feel like I did a really good job with the expressions on this. Patricia’s face is fun to draw.

I’m working on a bunch of stuff trying to get caught up, so Im going to cut this short and get as much done as I can while I’m feeling okay.

28 Comments

agreed, really nailed the expressions ~

I really like Rulette’s pose, in the last panel.

She seems to be tall, but she doesn’t use her tall-ness, in a pushy, or overbearing way,…around other people. :)

She’s standing up and they’re sitting.

Heh.
I like how she uses her tallness, regardless of that. :)

So what you’re saying is, “my point still stands”

Hee, hee,hee. Yep.
Does Rulette cause a lot of points to…!
:)

Typo in the last panel: “Apparently you sister” It should be ‘your’.

I’m loving the updates! Each page is endearing Patricia more and more to me

Ed is at the perfect height right now. The view must be incredible. :P

I’d be afraid of losing an eye. x_o

That’s what the glasses are for…

“I don’t want to be a dwarf.”

I hear those words so often when we start a campaign, and someone wants to min/max a warrior/barbarian. The answer usually is, “Well, you should either roll a human or a dwarf.”

Granted, I dislike min/max players. I understand trying to get a slight one-up when the game can be deadly, but trying to make the ultimate build in a tabletop game feels … too competitive with the other PCs. I always play up to my faults, and that usually makes the game more entertaining. Like the gnome who casts fireball but always stands too close to the target (and hoping that chance won’t kill him).

I don’t like it when people do this either, but we use a modified 2E which is super deadly if you don’t pay attention. and showing PCs that a broad spectrum of skill will help not party wipe is always a fun thing.

In my experience it depends on the game & group.

Some GM’s run their games quite deadly & any default system advantage can be quite appreciated.

Some Players also hold an attitude that each PC should play a specific Party Role, and should be built appropriate (Min-Maxed), or the Player is undermining the Party.

For me there’s a range.

I like playing “against type” for race, I loved my gnome fighter, for example. But I’m not gonna make Str and Con my lowest stats if I’m planning to be a frontline fighter, unless I have something clever in mind.

Rulette has a very plastic, expressive face…

I laught so hard, I scared the cat! What a punch line!
The art work really nailed the expressions, but still, the dialogue. Well done, Good Sir.

Yeah who would want to rp a dwarf?

Someone who likes a lot of hit points and knowing where they are underground.

Soooo…since Patricia is partly based on Peppermint Patty…[or so I guess], is Mike based on Charlie Brown? [No pun intended].

That’s racist! : O

Calling someone, Peppermint, is racist?
Dang. I’m sorry. I didn’t know. :D

You’ve probably figured it, anyhow, but- I was thinking that Charlie Brown has a very round face, + Mike has the roundest, guy-face on this team, ergo, I chose Mike to be like C. Brown, + all of that.

You have no respect for minty Americans!

*Does a forlorn pout* ;D

If you put Alex + Patricia in the same room, would that much awesomeness make the planet explode? :)

No, just our collective heads…

Hee hee hee! :)